Concurrent contracts, conflict-of-interest risk
Running fieldwork for two candidates in the same race means one data leak ends the relationship — and the firm's reputation with it.
Run every contract on one platform — isolated by design
Field surveys for multiple candidates at once — strict per-project separation, QC at scale, and decision-grade deliverables. Across 5 markets.
The problem
What research firms run into
Quality control doesn't scale by hand
Spotting a fabricated interview or an abnormally fast interviewer across thousands of submissions is impossible on a spreadsheet.
Clients want defensible numbers
A topline with no audit trail, no GPS, and no back-check is a number you can't stand behind the moment it's challenged.
How it works for you
How VoteEdge works for you
Offline-first collection, supervisor QC, GPS- and time-stamped interviews, suspicious-pattern auto-flagging, and back-checks — the full fieldwork operation.
A weekly, decision-grade report your client reads as ground truth: toplines, crosstabs, and per-location standings, with a margin of error on every number.
Each contract is access-scoped with its own roles; an audit entry records every cross-boundary attempt. Concurrent candidates never see each other's data.
Why VoteEdge
Why research firms choose VoteEdge
Strict separation, built in from day one
Per-project access, per-project roles, and a logged audit trail on every action — not a flag bolted on after a near-miss.
QC discipline at scale
Duration, straight-lining, GPS clustering, impossible geography, and back-check failure are flagged automatically for supervisor review.
One team, many candidates
Analysts share a dashboard; each project stays isolated. Run a national programme and five governorships from the same login.
Explore VoteEdge
More ways teams use VoteEdge
Get started
Run your next wave on VoteEdge
Tell us about your programme — markets, waves, and concurrent contracts. We'll scope it with you and send a tailored quote.